Smart Architecture

The Financial Dimension in Cultural Heritage Preservation

Written by Paula Echeverri Montes | Oct 24, 2024 1:21:35 PM

An approach from project management towards the preservation of cultural heritage and its economic sustainability.

Cultural heritage expresses the identity, history, and diversity of a community or nation. Therefore, the conservation and restoration of architectural heritage is a fundamental task to preserve the collective memory and cultural legacy of communities. Its importance cannot be overstated.

At echeverrimontes, we have participated in numerous projects for the intervention and preservation of cultural heritage. Beyond the particularities of each one, there is a common denominator when evaluating the success of our work: the need to guarantee the financial sustainability of the architectural ensemble, considering the viability of the investor or joint participation with a public entity in association models (such as public-private partnerships).

This is not always easy. But undoubtedly, it is an essential factor for the work carried out to make real sense, ensuring that the value of the ensemble can positively and sustainably impact the community.

The Financial Dimension as a Guarantee for Cultural Heritage Sustainability

One of the main challenges architectural heritage faces is its economic sustainability. In other words, how to ensure that its maintenance and management do not become an unsustainable financial burden for public administrations or private owners.

Therefore, it is essential that, within the framework of formulating a successful intervention and preservation project, the development of a strategic business model is considered. The idea is to transform the value of the heritage property into a competitive advantage that ensures its sustainability, capitalizing not only on the physical quality of the property but also on its cultural significance. In this way, its functional reactivation can be enhanced through economic sustainability.

Specifically, the goal is to incorporate a financial aspect into the projects that considers the possible income sources architectural heritage can generate. These sources include:

  • Enhancing infrastructure for the renewal of its use and functionality, and/or adding new architectural components.
  • Public or private management of educational, recreational, and tourist services for visitors.
  • Creating and commercializing cultural products based on heritage, such as books, magazines, movies, documentaries, exhibitions, performances, and crafts.
  • Organizing cultural events that promote knowledge and civic participation around heritage, such as festivals, fairs, contests, and workshops.
  • Cooperation between public and private entities for the development of cultural projects that involve heritage as a strategic resource for local development.

These activities, however, must be carried out with respect for the historical-artistic value of the architectural heritage and, where possible, with community involvement, so that its economic and social benefits can be maximized. It is important not to lose sight of the fact that these initiatives can generate employment and income for local cultural agents and strengthen the identity and sense of belonging of the inhabitants. Moreover, the value of cultural heritage adds significant weight to the business model and is crucial for reinforcing the cultural significance of assets and their impact on the cultural and economic development of a country.

Some Risks and How to Mitigate Them through Smart Management

Developing business models for heritage spaces also entails some risks and challenges that must be carefully considered and managed. For instance, the deterioration or loss of heritage due to intensive or inappropriate use of spaces, or its trivialization through excessive adaptation to market or mass public demands.

However, mitigating these risks is entirely possible when the project management includes, from its design, a series of measures and best practices aimed at valuing the spaces in a cross-cutting and inclusive manner. Some measures could be:

  • Creating public policies that promote cultural preservation with a broad and sufficient perspective to ensure the sustainability and cultural and economic development of the country.
  • Establishing a legal and institutional framework that regulates and protects cultural heritage as a public good and a human right.
  • Conducting participatory diagnoses to identify the needs, expectations, and interests of different social groups regarding cultural heritage.
  • Designing strategic plans that define clear objectives, measurable indicators, and concrete actions for the sustainable development of the cultural sector.
  • Implementing diversified funding mechanisms to ensure the economic and social viability of cultural projects related to heritage.
  • Promoting continuous training and innovation in the professional and creative skills of cultural agents linked to heritage.
  • Encouraging active and inclusive citizen participation in all stages of the cultural heritage lifecycle.

These are some best practices that can help create successful business models that generate economic and social value while respecting and appreciating a city’s cultural heritage.

Undoubtedly, heritage spaces and their architectural expression are key elements for the social, cultural, and economic development of communities. Therefore, their conservation and restoration require a comprehensive approach that combines technical, financial, and participatory aspects to ensure their preservation for present and future generations.